Category talk:Female RationalWikians
From RationalWikiWiki
Still missing articles for Eira and newcomer Lily the Pink. --Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 03:32, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- Yes, but have they done anything newsworthy? Anyway. Look at this - 50% of self identified females on RationalWiki are sysops. Affirmative action or what?--User:FalseFlagFlag Me 15:51, 7 March 2008 (EST)
- Wouldn't know. Didn't RA write something about this? --Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 15:54, 7 March 2008 (EST)
Contents |
[edit] Still missing
Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 02:24, 12 June 2008 (CDT)
[edit] Where's
Cat:Male RWians and Cat:Neuterl RWians? And Cat:WereRWians? (etc.) humanbe in 01:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- You can just assume that anything that isn't us (female RWians) is the rest of you.. no category needed! lol. :p and on an off topic note, by the way, Human is a very good name. And if I still had an account at CP I would have told them that. Refugee 04:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure. Perhaps if you're categorising people by gender you should also do it by sexual orientation.--Bob M 08:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's an interesting thought. But I don't think we should. There are good reasons to categorize by gender, but not really by sexual orientation. It could be noted on someone's profile, if anyone feels it's relevant, and if the person has chosen to make it known.. but make a category? I just don't see a reason for it. Refugee 21:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- Assuming the "non self identified as female" as male seems to me to be really poor investigative reporting. I don't see a legitimate reason for this category unless the others are included. Hell, for a year or so, I managed to have half of RW think I might be gay. And thanks on the user name ;) humanbe in 03:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's an interesting thought. But I don't think we should. There are good reasons to categorize by gender, but not really by sexual orientation. It could be noted on someone's profile, if anyone feels it's relevant, and if the person has chosen to make it known.. but make a category? I just don't see a reason for it. Refugee 21:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure. Perhaps if you're categorising people by gender you should also do it by sexual orientation.--Bob M 08:46, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Quantcast
The sample sizes there are evidently very low. 
16:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Redirects
This category contains itself. Twice. That;s TvTropes humor. Keep? Change? Tyrannis 20:26, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, hell. Just do as you wish. This is such a low-use Wiki that I'm sure nobody would get mad if you did some things unilaterally. Punky McPunkersen 20:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. Tyrannis 20:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Lesbians
With Susan dead, Teresita having disappeared under layers of forgettable socks some while ago & presumably gone by now, and Armondikov allegedly turning out to be a dude, are there any lesbians active at RationalWiki anymore? weaseLICIOuS Bite Me 23:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Who really cares, anyway? I mean, it's not a big deal, is it?--Colonel Sanders 23:43, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- Same goes for everything else at this site. What's the point? weaseLICIOuS Bite Me 23:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
- To satisfy boredom?--Colonel Sanders 00:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Same goes for everything else at this site. What's the point? weaseLICIOuS Bite Me 23:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
There's me. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 05:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
