Category talk:RationalWiki sysops

From RationalWikiWiki

Is this category necessary, given the recent trend to make all regular editors sysops? Very few RWW articles are about non-sysops. weaseLICIOuS ^{Bite Me} 12:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

It is a great honour to have one's knowledge and hard work recognised by being promoted to sysop at RW; and as such this category is absolutely necessary. More importantly, why isn't there an article about me me ME? DeltaStar 19:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I was going to rename this category, but since being a sysop on RationalWiki is the rule rather then the exception I think we should delete it instead. --Admin 00:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Everyone with an article here except MC is probably a sysop.Tyrannis 02:57, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

We could delete it. However, I think that if we do, we should create a "Regular users" category in lieu of this one, then. Punky McPunkersen 16:35, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

sysops ARE the regular users. name the cat 'non-sysops' --Test ^fail 18:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Just keep the damn thing. Conficker 19:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)