Talk:Mitch

From RationalWikiWiki

Should we really include this user? I see no sign of any importance of any kind. --Admin 05:11, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

It was linked to, and we have users included here that have not edited much at all, such as RyanB --Ryan 05:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't have a problem with "unimportant" users. So there's a page with their name on that probably nobody will ever look at. What actual harm is it doing? And if we are going to delete for that reason then we need:

• a clear reason why having articles on low edit-count users is a bad thing.
• a clear standard by which important (or not unimportant) users should be judged. Number of edits, time on the wiki or whatever.

But I really don't see the problem. Anyway, we could make the same argument about "dead" users. If they've not been around for a year or so then most people will have lost interest in them - but I wouldn't support deleting them.--False Flag 20:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

This user was just a random person's friend who popped in the wiki for a day or two and then left back a long long time ago. Besides, there are important users with no article yet, they deserve one, this guy doesn't. --Admin 15:12, 28 August 2010 (UTC)