Talk:Post-Conservapedia

From RationalWikiWiki

The article says: "When discussing people, post-Conservapedia refers to those users who joined for reasons other than Conservapedia."

I'd say this in untrue or at least misleading. All the old-timers like me joined becasue of CP, but I've pretty much lost interest in it now. So the fact that somebody initially joined becasue of CP shouldn't have them forever linked to the place.--Bob M 16:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cat?

Make a cat? Blue, Goonie, me, Bertran, etc. Tyrannis 00:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Well then. Guess no-one has any objections, so away we go! Tyrannis 16:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Cabal

The article says when talking about a reduced interest in CP:

• That, and most of the Cabal isn't that active anymore.

I think this is a bit of a slur on the cabal. Those members of the cabal who are no longer active have clearly lost interest in both RW and CP. Those who are still active have generally little interest in CP.--Bob M 20:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

When was the last time we could have said that there was an effective cabal? 2008 at the latest, surely. Armondikov 20:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Rewrite

Post-CP these days is more, as ADK put it "Operation Get The Fuck Over It Already", so I'm going to try for a rewrite later, but I am biased on this issue, so expect a major bit of a slant. Ty 19:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Isn't this just a previous incarnation of the matrix the more recent New Culture idea?--False Flag 21:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

If you consider it a coherent movement, then yeah, me gibbering in the corner would be similar. The drift from CP-related stuff has been happening for a while though, Sterile mentioned an essay he wrote and then deleted(I think) to that effect. Tyrannis^{An iron, yet caring fist} 22:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)