User talk:Brxbrx
From RationalWikiWiki
| Welcome to RationalWikiWiki, Brxbrx!!! Please see our policy on editing your own article, and why not tell us how you found the site. Any questions? Please see RationalWikiWiki Help. |
Yadda yadda yadda. You are promoted to holyroller. Ty 14:57, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Janitor
You got 2 more edits until Janitorship. Ty 15:04, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Editing you own article
Please don't. Please write nasty thing about other people. Also, you are more the regular these days. Ty 13:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- okey-dokey--Brxbrx 15:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent. Srsly though feel free to write things about anyone here, except yourself. Just remember citations. Ty 15:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Evenin' all
You are now a member of the constabulary. Blockings will commence at the next round of spamming attempts. Mind how you go. Rrose Selavy 07:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- You may wish to add quick block to your .js file for aid in spammer blocking. Ty 02:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
- I've done so many here I can almost quickblock by the usual route! Rrose Selavy 07:21, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Input
You should weigh in on these, other active person. Ty 01:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Edit war
Just let it go. Ty 17:16, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- well, I rolled it back just once. But he is a dick. The kind of dick that would be banned if we had an explicit anti-trolling policy.--Brxbrx 17:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Again, just let it go man. Ty 17:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's inappropriate to misdescribe me as a "dick" when all I was doing was defending myself. And if you're going to have an entry it needs to be accurate. Or you remove the entry. Nutty Roux 17:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- You're acting like a dick again right now. TerrenceKoeckring is nothing to do with me. SuspectedReplicant 17:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Really. Acting like a dick means defending myself against you attacking me. You know, Terrence Koeckring sounds just like you, but feel free to remove that bit if you feel like it. Seems like this is y'all's site to do whatever you want with. Nutty Roux 17:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- You're acting like a dick again right now. TerrenceKoeckring is nothing to do with me. SuspectedReplicant 17:22, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- It's inappropriate to misdescribe me as a "dick" when all I was doing was defending myself. And if you're going to have an entry it needs to be accurate. Or you remove the entry. Nutty Roux 17:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Again, just let it go man. Ty 17:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I get an email everytime somebody edits my talk page. This isn't going to turn into a flame war is it? I hate getting repetitive emails. I just got like, five today.--Brxbrx 17:24, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- I should edit this page more often :) I hope not, cause I'm going jogging. Ty 17:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
Meet Fall down. Ty 02:18, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- another edit to my talk page, another email...-Brxbrx 02:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- You should disable that. Ty 02:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- and not be notified of when someone on RW wishes to communicate with/flame me? Never!--Brxbrx 02:25, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- You should disable that. Ty 02:22, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Hypocrisy?
A suggestion is perhaps that you explain what the hypocrisy actually is... leaving things up to the reader can cause confusion. --Eira 04:43, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'm thinking it was simply a bad idea to put'er up in the first place. I should have just copied it to notepad and left in on my hard drive. As for it being hypocrisy, I think irony would be a better term. That he wanted a page here only to later bitch and moan about how this place is an invasion of privacy.--Brxbrx 04:50, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Why you got to try and hide stuff? It doesn't actually hide anything. Anyways, irony/hypocrisy... explaining it is sometimes a good idea, like your edit didn't make any sense... it's why I reverted it. There didn't appear to be any basis for the claim. It was an interesting "find", but it didn't really mean anything. I couldn't put any irony to it. --Eira 05:01, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
You've really got me now. Err... Wait, what's hypocritical or ironic about that? Do you really have that hard a boner for me that you're grasping for some weird irrelevant straw? If so, you're really missing the point here and I'd recommend spending a little more time thinking before you press Submit. Or going back to your psychiatrist. You're fixated on me as the antagonist when you don't even have a dog in this fight. Well, I guess you do to the extent that you know I think creepy presumptuous obsessive noobs like you are part of the problem. But check it. I'm not complaining about the existence of pages here. I'm not denying that I wanted one a little more than 2 years ago. What I'm complaining about is that this place became a mental institution for people like you and your pals, a club for internet stalkers, and the go-to destination for carrying on grudges from RW. The pages on users here should report what happens at RW, not their personal lives off the website. Why are you having a hard time understanding that? Are you being deliberately obtuse to score some kind of points here? If so, you're not making any sense. What's wrong with you? Nutty Roux 14:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Blocking
A bit triggerhappy, are we? Please unban me so I can make up some user page here. -- sunny256 (the same sunny256 as on RW.org) P.S. Hope this doesn't mess up anything, using Lynx from my server. Not exactly Firefox.
[edit] Go fuck yourself you little virgin
I've destroyed you before, don't give me even more ammunition to do so.
- You forgot "aspie authoritarian fascist basement-dweller." RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 15:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- destroyed me? if you say so. I figured UHM and I "destroyed" you when we established you were nothing but a needy and insecure troll wannabe desperately looking for attention and affirmation--Brxbrx 15:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You wish. Others have 'established' that before you, and they also thought they were equally as clever as you. 86.46.190.218 16:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ignore him. Marcus is just some sad drunk frustrated Irish teenager masturbating over the mention of his name in his mother's basement. He is really the most pitiable person on the site.67.159.44.134 18:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I bet you that if offers you comfort to think that. Some of the shenanigans by the little twats who love rules is absolutely heart renderingly pathetic that it requires insults of the most severe nature. 86.45.230.96 21:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Is this still going on?--Colonel Sanders 01:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Not really. now it's just MC bitching to an empty room. Brxbrx hasn't been around. It's quite hilarious, really. I think MC's next target should be TK or some other dead horse. Quijibo 01:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- Is this still going on?--Colonel Sanders 01:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
- I bet you that if offers you comfort to think that. Some of the shenanigans by the little twats who love rules is absolutely heart renderingly pathetic that it requires insults of the most severe nature. 86.45.230.96 21:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ignore him. Marcus is just some sad drunk frustrated Irish teenager masturbating over the mention of his name in his mother's basement. He is really the most pitiable person on the site.67.159.44.134 18:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Lol. You wish. Others have 'established' that before you, and they also thought they were equally as clever as you. 86.46.190.218 16:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- destroyed me? if you say so. I figured UHM and I "destroyed" you when we established you were nothing but a needy and insecure troll wannabe desperately looking for attention and affirmation--Brxbrx 15:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- You lot are a pack of idiots. Brx never went anywhere, he never intended on going anywhere. Just like his friend Ullhateme his LANCB was a pathetic plea for recognition and attention. Twats. 86.46.182.212 09:10, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Thou shalt not edit thine own article
You are naughty Maratrean 02:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Banned. Comeback tomorrow. Ty 02:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Seriously. That rule is the one really serious rule. I'll restore your rights tomorrow morning. Ty 03:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm just locking the article. Ty 03:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Man, you overreacted. And "white-washing?" Anyways, could you please put the Nx refs back? That needs a ref. I suppose you can remove the bit about my refusal to run as moderator causing riots in Canada.--Brxbrx 03:16, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, I'm just locking the article. Ty 03:12, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Seriously. That rule is the one really serious rule. I'll restore your rights tomorrow morning. Ty 03:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
[edit] In addition to the above
stop WIGOing yourself, sadsack. Rrose Selavy 10:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing wrong with WIGOing yourself. I used to WIGO to my alternate persona (TK) all the time. Punky McPunkersen 12:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- I used to WIGO CUR when I was "being" him here. Rrose Selavy 17:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- The only time it get pathetic is if you WIGO yourself on RWWW or RationalWikiWikiWikisWiki. Punky McPunkersen 12:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Err... I may have done that once or twice--Brxbrx 12:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Twice? That would double their content, wouldn't it? Rrose Selavy 18:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Err... I may have done that once or twice--Brxbrx 12:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- The only time it get pathetic is if you WIGO yourself on RWWW or RationalWikiWikiWikisWiki. Punky McPunkersen 12:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- I used to WIGO CUR when I was "being" him here. Rrose Selavy 17:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Do we have a template for this?
You mean like the cite web template on Wikipedia? No, we don't, and I hope we (and RW) never do. They're a pain in the arse to do and they confer little advantage. Rrose Selavy 18:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- I mean a template like we have on RW like this:{{w|boogedy-boo}}, but for linking to RationalWiki.--Brxbrx 19:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- I tried to copy what I use on Ameriwiki, but it doesn't work here, I think some difference in Mediawiki software version, so I give up. Actually, I made the W template on RW, although I made it by copying RW's WPA template that someone else made. Then I built a template on Ameriwiki to do the same, but I ended up with almost the exact same thing (guess there's only one way to do it, we might call that the anti-slogan of Perl.) Anyway, you can always use a Interwiki link: [[RW:Earth|RW's article on Earth]] => RW's article on Earth. (Except it goes to .com, which redirects - someone please update the interwiki table!) Maratrean 12:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] DFTT
Seriously, the best strategy is, unless he posts on your talkpage, to just leave his posts alone. Don't read them (you know they'll offend you anyways), and just let them sit by themselves. Trust me, it works on a low-use site like this. Punky McPunkersen 23:23, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] You fucking asshole
I don't want the IP of my fucking workplace viewable on RWW. It shouldn't matter whether you think it is OK or not - I must have had a reason so fucking leave it alone you stupid cunt. Ace McWicked 05:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- u mad?--Brxbrx 05:11, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- this is why people don't like you. that was personal information you bitch - sensitive information. But you don't give a shit. Ace McWicked 05:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- This section refers OK, so I know this is RWW, not RW, but, FFS, do try to stop being wanker of the decade. Bob Soles 08:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- this is why people don't like you. that was personal information you bitch - sensitive information. But you don't give a shit. Ace McWicked 05:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] 24 year old virgin
Remember when I forced you to admit that you were a virgin, and then in a flush of hot shame you tried to delete the edit, only for me to restore it? That was great fun. Do you still feel shame about that? That revelation is one of my personal highlights of all my years on RW. I take a lot of pride in that. 86.45.232.111 11:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I am twenty. And you forced nothing from me.--Brxbrx 14:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I forced you to admit that you were a 20 year old virgin. Marginally better than being a 24 year old one. I found it humourous how you got so embarassed and how you admitted it in the first place. I control and manipulate you. Brx, would it not be better for us to band together, to make common cause. Your enemies are surrounding you in a pincer movement and you're too oblivious to see it. 86.45.232.111 15:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- That last point is your answer. Old age and treachery will beat youth and skill every time. Or in Brxbrx's case, just youth. it's a lay-down. He's not smart enough to play the long game, just angry and stupid enough to remain oblivious to the fact that 3 people here can even stand him and even one of those is vocal about his outrageous behavior. Chat me up sometime, Marcus. Nutty Roux 15:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- I forced you to admit that you were a 20 year old virgin. Marginally better than being a 24 year old one. I found it humourous how you got so embarassed and how you admitted it in the first place. I control and manipulate you. Brx, would it not be better for us to band together, to make common cause. Your enemies are surrounding you in a pincer movement and you're too oblivious to see it. 86.45.232.111 15:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] CUR
He wasn't a fur, Camille. Ace McWicked 02:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Correct. He was a therian, or an otherkin. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 02:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. So you, like, fuck off with your douche-baggery. Ace McWicked 02:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- That'a sooooooo different--Brxbrx 03:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- It actually is, pinhead. One's about dressing up in costume to get your sexual kicks. One's about believing that you are something other than conventionally human. Read RW's fine articles on the topic. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Jesus Brx, you are consistently proving yourself to be a complete teacup. Even Lowkey, a creationist, is scoring point of you. Ace McWicked 03:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- People that want to be anthropomorphic animals. Sure, there's a subtle difference, but don't pretend a fursona is radically different than a guy thinking he's got animal DNA--Brxbrx 03:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Jesus Brx, you are consistently proving yourself to be a complete teacup. Even Lowkey, a creationist, is scoring point of you. Ace McWicked 03:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- It actually is, pinhead. One's about dressing up in costume to get your sexual kicks. One's about believing that you are something other than conventionally human. Read RW's fine articles on the topic. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 03:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- That'a sooooooo different--Brxbrx 03:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- Exactly. So you, like, fuck off with your douche-baggery. Ace McWicked 02:33, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
It is. You're wrong. Shut up. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 03:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Editing own profile
It is not allowed. Ace McWicked 23:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look over here, you rampant hypocrite. Notice how your name pops up, modifying your own article to your tastes?--Brxbrx 01:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Now kindly modify my article so that it reflects the truth, which is that only you and a couple of others make that complaint. Whether you like it or not, RW has changed. It's not your circle jerk anymore. --Brxbrx 01:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Get fucked, hillbilly. Nutty Roux 02:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's a new one. Not sure where it comes from--Brxbrx 02:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hey how's the new culture at RW treating you now that you're in the majority? Nutty Roux 03:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Except from the occasional jabs by you, Ace, and your ilk, pretty well actually.--Brxbrx 03:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're either delusional or you're a liar. The only majority you're in is people who detest you for your trolling, rudeness, and substanceless rubbish. It's obvious from your self-destruction that you hate yourself more than anyone could fathom. Nice misrepresentation with the jabs, too. You've made a months long campaign of trolling and defaming me. No amount of reframing can change that reality. Nutty Roux 15:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- You have a serious case of narcissism. Now go have a look at the votes (although with your seemingly distorted perception of reality, I don't expect much from you).--Brxbrx 16:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Lol I'm a narcissist says the little shit who can't stop lying to make himself feel better about how revolting a creature he is. What votes are you referring to, Brx? Let's see some support for your claim that your little culture war is getting any traction. Cunt. Nutty Roux 19:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Pay attention, will you? I am not talking about people who defend me. I am talking about people who want a little bit of civility and some rules for site interactions. Case in point, all the votes in the past few months: moderators, banning MC, censuring Human (I'm not talking about the final tally for this one, but the comments left on the votes in his favor), and the changes in the community standards. Your "trolling and flaming welcome" attitude is in the minority, and people are voting and calling for more civility and for more enforceable civility.--Brxbrx 20:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Lol I'm a narcissist says the little shit who can't stop lying to make himself feel better about how revolting a creature he is. What votes are you referring to, Brx? Let's see some support for your claim that your little culture war is getting any traction. Cunt. Nutty Roux 19:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- For the record, whitewashing one's own article is frowned upon. Generally speaking, we only let people make minor edits (i.e: fixing spelling) and remove obvious vandalism from their articles. And, no, don't anybody dare make the case that this falls under either of those or use that to make a point, or I'll personally vandal bin you. But, that aside, the one thing that this site never clearly established was the penalties for whitewashing as it's a leftover policy from times past and has seldom had to be enforced by the current regulars here. Punky McPunkersen 16:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- My edit was accurate. Take a look at it yourself.--Brxbrx 16:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have looked. In all honesty, I'm not 100% in agreement that this is an obvious case of "whitewashing." Then again, I can also see where people would get that impression. For the record, this is what obvious whitewashing looks like. I'm doubtful that you intended your edit to be interpreted as whitewashing one's own article. Punky McPunkersen 17:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That was your example? I have to question as to whether you know what whitewashing even means... Anyways, Ace implied that the entire community rejected my take on RW. I corrected his edit to show that in fact, it wasn't more than a few users that already had a grudge against me--Brxbrx 17:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's false. You're nearly universally loathed. 2 people stick up for you. None of them sticks up for the diarrhea that flows from your fingers. Nutty Roux 18:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, when exactly has wiki anarchism and hating brxbrx become the same thing? Because if that isn't the case, Nutty's objection up there has nothing to do with the question asked. Also, these bitchfights are getting boring. --Ullhateme 19:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? Wikianarchism? This is about Brxbrx's rose colored glasses. I'll stop observing Brxbrx's odious behavior and lack of worth as a human being when he apologizes to me for 5 months of slithering out of the woodwork to attack my qualifications, defame my character, and lie about me. Until then, he gets no quarter from me. And I could give a shit what does or doesn't bore you, UHM. We've been over this. Nutty Roux 19:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- I won't apologize to you, but on the subject of apologies, you owe Ty a big one. I mean, seriously, what's he ever done to you?--Brxbrx 20:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- I apologized as much as I will. Sorry you missed it, but it's not your business in any event. You've admitted those 2 edits are why you've been on a months long vendetta against me. I gotta say I laugh at how contrived and absurd that is when I'm reminded, but it's how you've described your own position so who am I to argue. I'll tell you what. You apologize to me for attributing motives to me that I don't have, misrepresenting my positions, slagging my qualifications, and generally bringing my name up whenever you can to attack me and we can put this all behind us. Nutty Roux 18:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I won't apologize to you, but on the subject of apologies, you owe Ty a big one. I mean, seriously, what's he ever done to you?--Brxbrx 20:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? Wikianarchism? This is about Brxbrx's rose colored glasses. I'll stop observing Brxbrx's odious behavior and lack of worth as a human being when he apologizes to me for 5 months of slithering out of the woodwork to attack my qualifications, defame my character, and lie about me. Until then, he gets no quarter from me. And I could give a shit what does or doesn't bore you, UHM. We've been over this. Nutty Roux 19:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wait, when exactly has wiki anarchism and hating brxbrx become the same thing? Because if that isn't the case, Nutty's objection up there has nothing to do with the question asked. Also, these bitchfights are getting boring. --Ullhateme 19:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's false. You're nearly universally loathed. 2 people stick up for you. None of them sticks up for the diarrhea that flows from your fingers. Nutty Roux 18:58, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That was your example? I have to question as to whether you know what whitewashing even means... Anyways, Ace implied that the entire community rejected my take on RW. I corrected his edit to show that in fact, it wasn't more than a few users that already had a grudge against me--Brxbrx 17:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have looked. In all honesty, I'm not 100% in agreement that this is an obvious case of "whitewashing." Then again, I can also see where people would get that impression. For the record, this is what obvious whitewashing looks like. I'm doubtful that you intended your edit to be interpreted as whitewashing one's own article. Punky McPunkersen 17:02, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- My edit was accurate. Take a look at it yourself.--Brxbrx 16:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- You have a serious case of narcissism. Now go have a look at the votes (although with your seemingly distorted perception of reality, I don't expect much from you).--Brxbrx 16:09, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're either delusional or you're a liar. The only majority you're in is people who detest you for your trolling, rudeness, and substanceless rubbish. It's obvious from your self-destruction that you hate yourself more than anyone could fathom. Nice misrepresentation with the jabs, too. You've made a months long campaign of trolling and defaming me. No amount of reframing can change that reality. Nutty Roux 15:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Except from the occasional jabs by you, Ace, and your ilk, pretty well actually.--Brxbrx 03:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hey how's the new culture at RW treating you now that you're in the majority? Nutty Roux 03:28, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's a new one. Not sure where it comes from--Brxbrx 02:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Get fucked, hillbilly. Nutty Roux 02:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Now kindly modify my article so that it reflects the truth, which is that only you and a couple of others make that complaint. Whether you like it or not, RW has changed. It's not your circle jerk anymore. --Brxbrx 01:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Facepalm doesn't even cover it. --Ullhateme 22:22, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
- Cover what?--Brxbrx 23:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] You didn't explain shit. Your IP isn't special
I don't have to explain nothing. So..you know...fuck off. Ace McWicked 09:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I would do the same thing if I accidentally posted from my workplace IP. Liveware Problem 13:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- You should. You have no reason to fear from your work IP to be visible. Are you afraid people will learn you're from New Zealand?--Brxbrx 14:45, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- How the fuck would you know? You can be incredibly stupid sometimes Brx. Ace McWicked 19:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you had explained why your IP, of all IPs, is so sensitive, I would not have pressed the issue--Brxbrx 20:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain to you. You didn't even ask why, you just kept exposing personal information someone was uncomfortable having exposed. That makes you an asshole. Ace McWicked 20:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're right. Doing something to someone that they don't want done to them is wrong. One needs to be sensitive to the needs of others. I am sorry, Ace. I don't know if my apologies mean anything to you, but at least I can promise that I will not do anything like this again. It doesn't matter your reasons, I should not have unmasked your IP. I also believe I acted in bad faith, since I had no reason to stop you from masking it other than the desire to piss you off. I apologize for my intentions, as well.--Brxbrx 17:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I know what you are doing Brx - I am cleverer than you. Ace McWicked 19:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I thought of drawing a comparison, but I didn't. And I won't. I am sincere in my apologies, whether you accept it or not.--Brxbrx 19:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Because insisting that someone shouldn't mind having there personal information displayed, despite the sensitive nature of it plus the fact the person in question moved quickly to remove said information and had to get into an edit war over something so simple to understand and pasting a picture of a cock on someones page are comparable? Asshole. Ace McWicked 20:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not going there. I'll admit, I had that in mind, but I did not wish to make this about that. Additionally, Crundy emailed me earlier today (hope you don't mind my mentioning this, Crundy) and told me how CP admins are likely to harass people's workplaces because of their IP's.
- I am sorry I did not respect your wishes.
- I am doubly sorry that I acted in bad faith.
- I am three times sorry that I risked exposing your IP to the likes of Karajou's malice.
- You may not believe that I am sincere, but these are my apologies. I can do nothing to convince you but I can at least promise that I won't do something like that again.--Brxbrx 00:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Crundy is most wise indeed. I shall not mention this again. Ace McWicked 01:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent. Though we may disagree on a number of things, it's good that I was able to communicate my contrition to you and that this issue is resolved between us.--Brxbrx 01:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just imagine the fun we could have together if you could communicate your contrition to me and we could move on past your vendetta. I'd apologize for my heinous acts and we could be pals not publicly attacking each other all the time. Nice! You'll have to shape up a bit though. Email me so we can discuss and I'll tell you all about it. Anyway, I'm tons more fun than that fuckface Ace. He's a sheep rapist, and that's a hard thing to be when the sheep are so deeply conditioned to offer their willing sheep snizzes up to itinerant sheepfuckers like that kiwi cunt that they could be overtaken on their way down the paddock by a gibbering, staggering drunk with a throbbing scarlet peen. Nutty Roux 03:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- I apologized to Ace in this particular instance for those particular actions. I still have my differences with him. I don't picture myself ever apologizing to you. You inspire too strong a dislike in me. Though I find Ace to be an immature troll, I still hold some affection for his antics. You, on the other hand, are vicious. I still fail to understand what you have against Ty, one of the nicest people in the community.--Brxbrx 14:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing. I like him. Have it your way. This will only get harder. Nutty Roux 15:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- That's what she said. Liveware Problem 20:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- You know, taken out of context, "Nothing. I like him. Have it your way. This will only get harder." is gloriously nonsensical. I kind of want to put it at the top of Nutty Roux's page, now. Hans Johnson I'll get my hans on it 23:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Kinda like he cruelly attacked Ty on the top of his user page. Poetic--Brxbrx 23:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah it was definitely the most savage thing anyone's ever said to another person on RationalWiki. I don't know how we've all been able to continue. I'm glad that you at least have been able to maintain the appropriate level of outrage for 5+ months. Keep your vendetta if you want then. I'm not going anywhere and I like fighting. Nutty Roux 00:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Kinda like he cruelly attacked Ty on the top of his user page. Poetic--Brxbrx 23:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing. I like him. Have it your way. This will only get harder. Nutty Roux 15:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- I apologized to Ace in this particular instance for those particular actions. I still have my differences with him. I don't picture myself ever apologizing to you. You inspire too strong a dislike in me. Though I find Ace to be an immature troll, I still hold some affection for his antics. You, on the other hand, are vicious. I still fail to understand what you have against Ty, one of the nicest people in the community.--Brxbrx 14:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just imagine the fun we could have together if you could communicate your contrition to me and we could move on past your vendetta. I'd apologize for my heinous acts and we could be pals not publicly attacking each other all the time. Nice! You'll have to shape up a bit though. Email me so we can discuss and I'll tell you all about it. Anyway, I'm tons more fun than that fuckface Ace. He's a sheep rapist, and that's a hard thing to be when the sheep are so deeply conditioned to offer their willing sheep snizzes up to itinerant sheepfuckers like that kiwi cunt that they could be overtaken on their way down the paddock by a gibbering, staggering drunk with a throbbing scarlet peen. Nutty Roux 03:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Excellent. Though we may disagree on a number of things, it's good that I was able to communicate my contrition to you and that this issue is resolved between us.--Brxbrx 01:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Crundy is most wise indeed. I shall not mention this again. Ace McWicked 01:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Because insisting that someone shouldn't mind having there personal information displayed, despite the sensitive nature of it plus the fact the person in question moved quickly to remove said information and had to get into an edit war over something so simple to understand and pasting a picture of a cock on someones page are comparable? Asshole. Ace McWicked 20:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I thought of drawing a comparison, but I didn't. And I won't. I am sincere in my apologies, whether you accept it or not.--Brxbrx 19:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I know what you are doing Brx - I am cleverer than you. Ace McWicked 19:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- You're right. Doing something to someone that they don't want done to them is wrong. One needs to be sensitive to the needs of others. I am sorry, Ace. I don't know if my apologies mean anything to you, but at least I can promise that I will not do anything like this again. It doesn't matter your reasons, I should not have unmasked your IP. I also believe I acted in bad faith, since I had no reason to stop you from masking it other than the desire to piss you off. I apologize for my intentions, as well.--Brxbrx 17:34, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have to explain to you. You didn't even ask why, you just kept exposing personal information someone was uncomfortable having exposed. That makes you an asshole. Ace McWicked 20:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you had explained why your IP, of all IPs, is so sensitive, I would not have pressed the issue--Brxbrx 20:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- How the fuck would you know? You can be incredibly stupid sometimes Brx. Ace McWicked 19:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
- You should. You have no reason to fear from your work IP to be visible. Are you afraid people will learn you're from New Zealand?--Brxbrx 14:45, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I like fighting also! What I want to fight about is the fact that it took an email from Crundy for you to understand why I might not want my IP exposed as if I even needed a reason. Ace McWicked 01:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- I thought you said you wouldn't mention it again. I'm sorry. Really. Can we put this behind us? I know what I did was wrong, I regret it, I know why it was wrong, and most importantly I won't do it again--Brxbrx 05:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
[edit] PROTIP
No, seriously, drop the butthurt grudge against WfG. It's not going to earn you any friends. -- Nx / talk 21:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'll drop it as soon as she gives a sincere (like, not sarcastic) apology for trying to tell me, a native speaker of French, how to speak my language.--Brxbrx 21:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Some problems
- The wiki would be better off without him. No Brx, the wiki would be better of without you who has done nothing but get under everyone's skin. Look at how well you are liked compared to Human.
- It was a real dick move of him to post those emails (and fucking repost them after it was quite clear you didn't want him to) You mean like if someone accidently posted their IP and wanted it removed but someone else kept reverting it? An IP being of far greater personal significance than an anon email.
- Maybe you can convince him to take a more active hand in this, and get rid of Human. Trent is far more likely to get rid of you than Human. Be careful what you wish for because if users start getting binned/blocked you'd find yourself gone in short order.
- Maybe he's contributed in the past, but since I've been here he's been nothing but trouble. Funny, because since you arrived you have been nothing but trouble.
So basically you're a hypocritical asshole who doesn't realize just how close to the sail he is flying. Ace McWicked 02:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- You know, just a little bit above this very topic there's my apology you accepted for that whole IP thing. And since I've arrived, I've created a few articles, improved some others, and yes, I've gotten under people's skin. But my actions haven't caused nearly as much drama as Human. I like RationalWiki. It's a shame some people think it's their playground.--Brxbrx 04:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- I accepted your apology? So what? All my points stand. You're an asshole and you continue to prove so without displaying any redeeming features. You like RW but it doesn't like you. Good luck with your wiki-break. Ace McWicked 04:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Don't poke Human Brxbrx. --Ullhateme 09:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Sysoppry
Since you're one of the few people around this palce and, given the current state of all things wandal, I've reinstated your full sysop rights. Punky McPunkersen 15:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- very well--Brxbrx 16:58, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] I'm supposed to roll with the punches, and Ace isn't?
I'll explain this with small words, since I know you will willfully try to misunderstand it. Ace made a joke with the kindergarten edit. It might be funny, it might not. You adding his name to his joke is akin to some little kid going "I know you are but what am I?" , which is decidedly annoying and completely unfunny. You want to "get" back at Ace? Don't ride on his coat-tails like that. Come up with your own, original thing. Otherwise, you're only succeeding in making yourself look petty and kinda dumb. Like a kid in kindergarten. What I did there. Do you see it? RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 14:20, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't "getting back" at Ace. I was proving a point that we shouldn't make such personal attacks. But it won't work if you're babying him and protecting him from any criticism. See, it seems that on RWW you're only really allowed to make fun of or say bad things about Brxbrx and Maratrean. Anybody else and you get some oddly persistent (considering they all have such fabulous lives) Aces, Nutties, and Humans reverting your edit. Add yourself to that list.--Brxbrx 14:38, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, come up with a smart, FUNNY, ORIGINAL and non-whiny-bitch way to make a point about the people and things that tick you off, and I'll sit back and laugh. And so will they. But as long as you insist on being dumb, unfunny, derivative and whiny, you won't get very far. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 14:45, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck you and your shitlists Brxbrx. I am frequently surprised by just what a shameless liar you are. Nutty Roux 15:18, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Remember that whole I hate Ty thing, where it was WIGOed and you got mad and kept changing the WIGO? That's a single incident. I guess if I felt like it I could look for more but that would make me as sad as you--Brxbrx 19:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- I need protection from criticism? News to me. Ace McWicked 19:25, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Shut up, you sheep-fucking dipsomaniac. "Ace McWanker" is more like it. See? No protection needed. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 20:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck you, RUR. Yeah. Ace McWicked 20:49, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Shut up, you sheep-fucking dipsomaniac. "Ace McWanker" is more like it. See? No protection needed. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 20:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- I need protection from criticism? News to me. Ace McWicked 19:25, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Remember that whole I hate Ty thing, where it was WIGOed and you got mad and kept changing the WIGO? That's a single incident. I guess if I felt like it I could look for more but that would make me as sad as you--Brxbrx 19:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck you and your shitlists Brxbrx. I am frequently surprised by just what a shameless liar you are. Nutty Roux 15:18, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, come up with a smart, FUNNY, ORIGINAL and non-whiny-bitch way to make a point about the people and things that tick you off, and I'll sit back and laugh. And so will they. But as long as you insist on being dumb, unfunny, derivative and whiny, you won't get very far. RationalwikiwikiUndergroundResistor 14:45, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] No!
[1] I am not Bavarian. For everybody outside of Bavaria that's like calling a San Franciscan a Texan. Don't ever say that without being able to flee the scene. I'm from the South-West, not South-East part of Germany, that's still an awful place to grow up, but not that awful. --Ullhateme 18:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Huh. Thought you said you were from Munchen? Isn't that in Bavaria?--77.247.181.164 19:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
