User talk:Mega

From RationalWikiWiki

[edit] And we're off

I'll start this conversation going so my own talk page isn't a red link. Mega 01:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't edit your own article Teresita. It's against the rules here - add your facts to the talk page, others will update the article. Or, are you a doppelganger? human^{be in} 07:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on your skills as a detective, Human. Where did you uncover that "Mega" was Teresita, on my RW home page ? ;=) Mega 14:31, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Could we have a second opinion here. Was Teresita really a member of RationalWiki 1.0? Even more remarkably, is she a member of the Cabal?--False Flag 19:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] How I found the RW

I discovered Conservapedia after hearing Andy pitch it on a local Seattle radio talk show and contributed 324 edits in the first two weeks of April 2007. I even earned "Edit of the Week". Then I was invited to the Rationalpedia, and I did quite a few edits there, and even attended the IRC channel associated with that place. Ed Poor somehow wormed his way into the IRC channel associated with that wiki, and started throwing his weight around, and kicked me from that channel. I discovered RationalWiki after checking up on CP via WP. RatWiki was only about three months old at the time.Teresita 02:50, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

It was called the Rationalpedia before it was RationalWiki. ColinR invited me there by email through my CP account info, I was close buds with PalMD and TMT. I was never in the "Cabal" (there is no such thing as a Cabal) but I do have a history with this project. Mega 21:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you and Trent were BFFs, haha. Get over yourself. human^{be in} 04:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

User:Mega has withdrawn her enthusiasm for the RWW project.

For the record RationalWiki has never been called Rationalpedia. There was a debate about changing the name at the closure of RW1 but it was decided to keep the name.--False Flag 07:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Gawd you are so confused, and a delightful egomaniac. What an interesting combination. human^{be in} 03:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)