User talk:PCHS-NJROTC
From RationalWikiWiki
| Welcome to RationalWikiWiki, PCHS-NJROTC!!! Please see our policy on editing your own article, and why not tell us how you found the site. Any questions? Please see RationalWikiWiki Help. |
So how did you come across your article here? Liveware Problem 03:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I went to the RW User Profiles page looking for Keegscee's page. I have a hypothesis that the certified letter I sent to his ISP worked (he was sending harassing emails to me and trolling at Wikipedia). PCHS-NJROTC 03:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I meant how did you find RWW? Through RW? Liveware Problem 03:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I found it a while back, I think it was through RW, but I don't exactly remember. I'm not here to start drama, and I probably won't stick around long. Are you a RatWikian, Conservapedian, or Wikipedian? PCHS-NJROTC 03:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- A lot of people here think I'm a complete douchebag, but I'm really not. I do a lot of charity work, with ROTC and at a local hospital. Being an ultra-conservative doesn't make somebody a dirtbag anymore than being a far left liberal, and believe me, I've known more dirtbag liberals than dirtbag conservatives. But oh well. I guess acting like a cheerleader-hater at Wikipedia for a short time was mean considering the one's I knew at school were sweethearts, but what do you expect when "LBHS Cheerleader" (who I doubt was actually an LBHS Cheerleader) is always trying to tear down the articles you work so hard to build. Conservapedia is not a bad site like some people at RW think; I used it in my senior term paper and got an A. They just disagree with it. PCHS-NJROTC 03:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- You got an A by using CP? That must have been...amusing. Just a thought.RascalJack 06:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I find it quite charming, really, that you accuse us of stalking you, yet your appearance within days of us creating a nice article bashing you (as that's what RWW is for: bashing RW users) would suggest to me that it is you, in fact, who are stalking us. Especially your apparent stalking of Keegscee from Wiki to Wiki. Punky McPunkersen 14:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah come on Goonie, let's cut him some slack-after all, all his trolling attempts have failed anyway. RascalJack 20:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- You people are funny! I'm not accusing you, Punky McPunkersen, of stalking, but some people here have been guilty of it. I am not stalking Keegscee, but rather checking to see if his internet account is alive after an abuse report. Because if they didn't act on the AR I would have to escalate it. PCHS-NJROTC 21:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah come on Goonie, let's cut him some slack-after all, all his trolling attempts have failed anyway. RascalJack 20:09, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I find it quite charming, really, that you accuse us of stalking you, yet your appearance within days of us creating a nice article bashing you (as that's what RWW is for: bashing RW users) would suggest to me that it is you, in fact, who are stalking us. Especially your apparent stalking of Keegscee from Wiki to Wiki. Punky McPunkersen 14:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- You got an A by using CP? That must have been...amusing. Just a thought.RascalJack 06:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, I meant how did you find RWW? Through RW? Liveware Problem 03:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Editing your own article
Please read this rule. Now, I realize your edits are not against the rule, so your good to go for now. But this is just an reminder if you suddenly have an urge to edit your own article praising yourself or something. RascalJack 20:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- LMAO, I pretty much figured anybody praising themselves here would be blown out of the water. PCHS-NJROTC 21:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
[edit] Areas of common ground
I can honestly say that I do, at least, have a couple areas of common ground with you:
- I didn't try to get RationalWiki users banned per se, but I do feel that RationalWikians teame up and effectively meatpuppet on certain articles, breaking the balance, and I feel that their liberalization of those articles hinders the project's integrity. I feel there should be a fair balance between liberalism and conservatism at WP. While I wouldn't say there is some large RW conspiracy going about Wikipedia to make the articles have a liberal bias, I do agree that WP articles should achieve a theoretical, NPOV balance between conservatism and liberalism.
- I do not troll the Facebook page for CP. It would not make sense for me to do that. Having looked at the page in question, I agree you aren't a troll there.
- I'm apparently drama-queen on Wikipedia, and so is pretty much everyone at Wikipedia; you can't escape the drama there even if all you do is build articles and mind your own business! Agree. Wikipedia seems to be drama central, and that's why I've always avoided doing much more than grammar and spelling edits there, minus the occasional vandalism revert.
You see, we can find some sort of common ground. Punky McPunkersen 13:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
